Mortgage Market Study inconsistencies make for frustrating read

27 Mar 2019

The press release which accompanies the FCA’s Mortgages Market Study Final Report has the headline, ‘FCA acts to help mortgage prisoners’.

Now, if I was heading up the PR strategy for the regulator when it comes to the report, that’s exactly how I would have couched it. Who can argue with intervention in this part of the market?

It is to something of our shame that we have let this particular issue fester on for so long, and that there are still tens of thousands of borrowers sat on expensive rates, who are completely up to date with their payments, and would (ordinarily) be able to move to a new lender/cheaper product.

By the same token, there should be industry support to help those who are essentially prisoners of their own making – who do not move off more expensive rates when they could clearly save money by doing so. Advisers have worked hard to help these borrowers and there should clearly be a role for the advice community to market its services to those who would benefit from them.

So, all well and good then? Following last year’s Interim Report which set the proverbial cat amongst the pigeons on any number of intermediary-related areas, the FCA has clearly listened to the industry and decided to roll-back on its rhetoric, to accept this market works well, to support the work of advisers and the importance of advice in this increasingly complicated space, and to allow the market to function as it should do.

You’ll sense a hint of sarcasm in that paragraph, because that’s very far from the approach adopted by the FCA in its Final Report. While it has clearly hoped that all the media headlines would be garnered by its focus on mortgage prisoners, it also seems to have thought that the mortgage industry would not read the rest of the report, and would not have a viewpoint on the document.

If that was its intention, then I’m afraid it’s got the temperature of the market very wrong, especially when it comes to (amongst other things): a continuation of its fixation on price from the Interim Report, it’s suggestion that advisers pick the first suitable product they see in order to secure a quick procuration fee rather than a potentially cheaper option, the persistent pursuit of an advisory firm comparison tool, the suggestion that advice is not necessary for certain groups of consumers, not forgetting a seemingly continued drive towards more execution-only business delivered by ‘tools’ which it does not give any further detail on.

At the same time – and indeed in the same report – it also states that the market works effectively for the vast majority of consumers, it says those consumers using intermediaries are less likely to be on a more expensive rate, plus it has no plans to intervene when it comes to pricing, despite suggesting that large numbers of borrowers are seemingly missing out.

To say this is a report of contradictions is something of an understatement. Indeed, at times it feels like it’s been written by two different teams who have failed to communicate with each other.

Within 50 pages it outlines how the market absolutely needs a comparison tool/directory to allow consumers to better compare intermediary firms, and yet it makes inclusion in this directory voluntary. It says that consumers absolutely need better upfront information on the products they are eligible for, even though advisers have all this available to them, and argues that the industry needs to come up these tools in order to make it happen.

My overwhelming feeling is that last year’s Interim Report was a chastening experience for those who wrote it, and that the criticism has been taken on board, but not truly accepted. How else would you explain the constant attempts to justify the recommendations outlined last year which still do not add up to any intervention?

If the FCA was that concerned consumer detriment was high, surely it would have put measures in place? Apart from the warranted measures regarding mortgage prisoners, there is precious little to suggest the regulator believes the issues it raises so vociferously warrant any sort of action. Which to my mind suggests they don’t need raising in the first place.

The example regarding brokers choosing products based on ‘incentives’ seem particularly ludicrous – those ‘incentives’ being the procuration fee. To suggest advisers can’t marry up eligibility and choose the most suitable/best priced product because they are too intent on picking the first product that shows its head in order to secure a quick proc fee, is just nonsense.

Brokers can be quick, efficient and ensure the most suitable product is chosen – and for any FCA person reading this, price is still not the sole arbiter. Regardless of whether you can find a product cheaper, the adviser considers much more, even if it seems like you still can’t buy this argument.

Overall, the mortgage prisoner action apart, it’s hard not to be disappointed by this Final Report. It seems far too intent on justifying last year’s Interim Report rather than accepting it may have mis-judged the market. When your work does not add up to your conclusions, sometimes it’s better to say you got the work wrong rather than present it for marking again.

Bob Hunt

Blog Archive

Opinion: The mortgage revolution is unfolding 
10 Dec 2018

Brokers’ fortitude will see them through this ‘depressing and dispiriting’ situation 
10 Dec 2018

Paradigm CEO Hunt invests in mortgage switching platform Dashly 
19 Nov 2018

We should be confident despite the uncertainties 
14 Nov 2018

FCA should leave mortgage market alone until Brexit uncertainty lifts 
09 Nov 2018

Not following EU rules could benefit the market 
16 Oct 2018

Long-term fixes fail to catch on 
01 Oct 2018

Mortgage market must ensure it deals in Project Clarity 
21 Sep 2018

Advisers can help landlords get their skates on for HMO changes 
11 Sep 2018

A deeper look at the state of the UK lending market 
17 Aug 2018

Understanding product transfers 
30 Jul 2018

‘Go compare’ is not so ‘simples’ 
26 Jul 2018

It’s worth looking into later life lending 
05 Jun 2018

SVRs are a cash cow for many mortgage lenders 
04 Jun 2018

Leaving a network should be more straightforward 
08 May 2018

Not all later life customers are in the same boat 
03 May 2018

Advisers must beware leasehold ‘minefield’ 
16 Apr 2018

It’s just not cricket 
12 Apr 2018

Proc fee timescales are way off 
29 Mar 2018

Broker-lender relations have undergone a fundamental shift 
28 Mar 2018

Opening at weekends shouldn’t be a priority 
13 Mar 2018

Take control to signpost clients in your direction 
22 Feb 2018

Product transfer: ‘Lenders might view greater adviser involvement as a problem’ 
12 Feb 2018

Buy-to-let advice is needed more than ever 
08 Feb 2018

Open Banking is a revolution without the fanfare 
16 Jan 2018

Land Registry needs to engage with brokers over Instant Mortgage 
08 Jan 2018

Simply focusing on age will not fix borrowing into retirement 
22 Dec 2015

Reduce the regulatory burden for firms by reallocating money from FCA fines 
03 Nov 2015

Customer choice has narrowed – the FCA could help fix this 
02 Nov 2015

The regulator’s differing interpretations of rules 
21 Oct 2015

Change is constant 
08 Oct 2015

Paradigm signs exclusive specialist lending deal with Brightstar 
06 Oct 2015

Landlords cash in on PRS 
22 Sep 2015

MCD – no grace but plenty of favours 
16 Sep 2015

Equity release success signals change in consumer perspective 
05 Aug 2015

Remortgagers play at ‘chicken or egg’ 
29 Jul 2015

BTL has closed the housing gap 
20 Jul 2015

Analysis: Writing a will can avoid a death blow 
15 Jul 2015

Industry deserves housing minister appointed to Cabinet 
22 Jun 2015

Waiving Stamp Duty won't encourage downsizing 
08 Jun 2015

Damned if they do, damned if they don’t 
01 Jun 2015

In the Spotlight with Bob Hunt 
26 May 2015

Election result provides stability 
20 May 2015

‘Grey borrower’ power is set to grow 
13 May 2015

Decisive election result could spur new build revolution 
27 Apr 2015

MMR 12 months on 
13 Apr 2015

Mind the protection gap 
09 Apr 2015

Analysis: Change status with the right support 
08 Apr 2015

Housing will be election battleground 
16 Mar 2015

Securing the specialist string to your bow 
04 Mar 2015

Interest rate direction is anyone’s guess 
04 Mar 2015

Regulatory B2L change is inevitable 
12 Feb 2015

Analysis: Do your homework with relationships 
04 Feb 2015

Lenders rising to the self-employed challenge 
04 Feb 2015

The sectors to watch in 2015 
06 Jan 2015

A helping hand 
05 Jan 2015

Can a landlord be truly ‘accidental’? 
17 Dec 2014

Coming in from the cold 
05 Dec 2014

Analysis: Why distribution demands inclusion 
12 Nov 2014

HSBC’s move signals cost of branch advice still rising 
20 Oct 2014

Analysis: Broker community boosted by HSBC 
15 Oct 2014

Just when I thought I was out 
08 Sep 2014

Analysis: Owning a home is not out of reach 
03 Sep 2014

Take level 4 advice exams before the FCA steps in 
02 Sep 2014

Analysis: Get set for more BoE intervention 
20 Aug 2014

Welcome to the Twilight Zone 
11 Aug 2014

Housing policy deserves seat at top table – Bob Hunt 
24 Jul 2014

MMR is enough to slow the bubble 
09 Jul 2014

Help to Buy remains in the spotlight 
08 Jul 2014

Mixed messages risk consumer confusion - Bob Hunt 
03 Jul 2014

It’s good to talk 
20 Jun 2014

H2B a rare housing policy success 
18 Jun 2014

Increasing mortgage volume will come through brokers - Bob Hunt 
27 May 2014

The better option to going direct 
14 May 2014

FCA concerned by packaging renaissance 
12 May 2014

Watch out for European regulation by year-end 
06 May 2014

Ask the Experts: Will MMR cause mass application declines? 
22 Apr 2014

Ask the Experts: Can a broker operate MMR-compliantly before 26 April? 
17 Apr 2014

Cross-sales not just for times of crisis 
16 Apr 2014

Brokers in the dock 
26 Mar 2014

Lenders in catch 22 situation over MMR - Bob Hunt 
25 Mar 2014

Paradigm launches protection arm 
21 Mar 2014

‘MMR Day’ may be a damp squib 
12 Mar 2014

Make sure your papers are in order 
12 Mar 2014

MMR lending slowdown could force protection bonanza 
18 Feb 2014

Countdown to MMR 
12 Feb 2014

A big year ahead for lenders 
04 Feb 2014

If the quality is same – why can’t AR & DA proc fees be equalised? 
30 Jan 2014

BoE is unlikely to be trigger-happy 
15 Jan 2014

We’re not in 2008 anymore 
09 Jan 2014

FCA cannot ignore views of smaller firms 
13 Dec 2013

The Prediction Game 
06 Dec 2013

Stay ahead of the regulator with CPD 
27 Nov 2013

Don’t let booming business hamper MMR preparation 
21 Nov 2013

Living up to expectations 
15 Nov 2013

MMR compliance underpins success 
30 Oct 2013

Advisers should step up to level 4 qualifications 
24 Oct 2013

Bank of England must follow words with actions 
02 Oct 2013

Lean times leave a leaner, keener core 
04 Sep 2013

If you don't ask lenders, you don't get 
22 Aug 2013

Steady as she goes is the right approach 
20 Aug 2013

Are we about to see a broker boom? 
16 Jul 2013

Now is not the time for procrastination 
10 Jul 2013

Improving standards is no grounds for complaint 
03 Jul 2013

Is product innovation being tied in knots? 
24 Jun 2013

We can’t rely on external stimulus 
06 Jun 2013

Put your services in the shop window 
06 Jun 2013

Mutual Magic 
30 May 2013

Does the FCA understand human frailty? 
07 May 2013

Has the mortgage market regained its mojo? 
17 Apr 2013

Help to Buy plus prudence equals prosperity 
05 Apr 2013

Will George Osborne be having a flutter ahead of the Budget? 
14 Mar 2013

Size matters on capital adequacy 
04 Mar 2013

Mortgage Indemnity Guarantees: helping first-time buyers fly 
19 Feb 2013

HS2? I’d rather see more houses built instead 
06 Feb 2013

95% LTV mortgages are not back... yet 
22 Jan 2013

Regulators have listened to feedback 
21 Jan 2013

The Great House Price Debate 
07 Jan 2013

Keeping your clients' wills up to date 
02 Jan 2013