Brokers need fair play from lenders in high LTV space
31 Jul 2020
High loan to value (LTV) lending provision is likely to remain a key issue for all mortgage market stakeholders throughout the rest of the summer and beyond, not least because it’s so very difficult to see how the situation is going to change in the weeks ahead.
The easiest point for me to make would be to urge lenders to begin lending at high LTV levels immediately or to lend far more than they are now.
I could suggest it is somehow a dereliction of duty, particularly for the larger, mainstream players not to do this, and argue they will be the ones to blame if we aren’t able to take full advantage of the stamp duty holiday.
But, the truth of the matter, is that I don’t believe those points because – to me – they smack of a real simplification of the current issues for lenders at high LTV levels.
It would also be tantamount to me urging lenders to lend irresponsibly at a point of great uncertainty for the UK economy and for many, many borrowers.
However, the support the intermediary community is giving lenders regarding high LTVs and the difficult decisions they are having to make comes with some caveats, because there needs to be a fairness brought into play here.
Fair play needed
You cannot operate without a level-playing field in one connected part of the market and expect wholesale intermediary support in another.
Take NatWest, for instance, which withdrew its key account product range and more recently made its 85 per cent LTV products only available through its direct channel.
At a time when there is clearly a strong demand for such products, to recognise that and yet only serve that demand via direct business channels, not letting advisers have access to those products is clearly unfair.
It’s certainly not reasonable for lenders to be exercising the LTV equivalent of dual-pricing, especially given the strong demand for mortgages.
Indeed, one top five lender recently revealed to me that it was currently doing the same volumes of business at 75-85 per cent LTV as it had been for 75-90 per cent, and that lender is at the very maximum of its operational capacity.
This may be down to borrowers finding a way to get the extra deposits together, demand being that strong, and the lender not feeling it needed to go any further up the risk curve than it deemed currently necessary.
Cut some slack
It is a frustrating time but lenders may find that advisers are willing to cut them some significant slack, willing to advise clients to park their current high LTV need if they appear to be chasing the wrong loan at the wrong time, willing to work with them in terms of how they release high LTV product funds, if there is seen to be a fundamental fairness at play as well.
No-one believes this is the ideal situation – not by any chalk – and reasonable advisers are certainly not demanding that lenders take risks that they certainly shouldn’t be at this point.
But that focus on the reasonable should also extend the other way, in terms of lenders being fair to intermediary partners and not simply serving their own interests when there is an opportunity to serve both.
Let’s try to invoke that phrase ‘We’re all in this together’ and perhaps truly mean it this time round.

Blog Archive
Lenders have not got to grips with how the pandemic impacted borrowers
05 Mar 2021
Supply needs to match demand
02 Mar 2021
Don't overlook product transfers
19 Feb 2021
Stamp duty debate a black hole
05 Feb 2021
Industry wide levy is a head scratcher
02 Feb 2021
Long-term imposter product may finally become relevant as a high LTV option
29 Jan 2021
Uncertainty continues into 2021
07 Jan 2021
Stay ahead of the fraudsters
21 Dec 2020
Industry change starts with what we do ourselves and within our businesses
11 Dec 2020
Second lockdown will keep lender resource focused on payment deferrals
09 Nov 2020
Is now the right time to add to property portfolios?
08 Sep 2020
Advisers have duty of care as fraudsters step up scam activity
17 Aug 2020
IFAs and mortgage advisers – two sides of the same coin
12 Aug 2020
Brokers need fair play from lenders in high LTV space
31 Jul 2020
Are you ready for lock-stalgia?
03 Jul 2020
Show your clients what you can do
19 Jun 2020
Specialist lenders may need end to self-cert payment holidays to survive
16 Jun 2020
Reading the signals
15 Jun 2020
Is the FCA really in this with us?
28 May 2020
Self-employed people must not be locked out of future mortgage borrowing
11 May 2020
I wish I could say the worst is over
07 Apr 2020
Looking for scintillating letters of recommendation
11 Mar 2020
FCA must answer why it is promoting execution-only
25 Feb 2020
Goodbye doesn’t have to be forever
17 Feb 2020
FCA changes could have harmful consequences
07 Feb 2020
This could be the year of economic stimulation
03 Feb 2020
Putting the cart before the horse
17 Jan 2020
The start of a new decade
15 Jan 2020
The importance of advice
12 Dec 2019
Keep in touch with clients or lose them for good
06 Dec 2019
Later life market still needs work to be fit for purpose
22 Nov 2019
Helping mortgage prisoners
04 Nov 2019
Combatting mortgage fraud
20 Sep 2019
Upping demand for green mortgages
17 Jul 2019
Tory leadership hopefuls are right to be focused on social care in later life
01 Jul 2019
Responding to political messages about the housing market
20 Jun 2019
Promoting execution-only is not treating customers fairly
10 Jun 2019
Changing regulatory permissions can be the making of your business
14 May 2019
If we don’t talk up the market, then who will?
02 May 2019
Deeper product transfer data would show lenders’ market shifts
29 Mar 2019
Mortgage Market Study inconsistencies make for frustrating read
27 Mar 2019
The relationship between lender, broker and borrower
18 Feb 2019
Advisers must not leave mainstream mortgage market to lenders
28 Jan 2019
Let’s not blow Fleet and Secure Trust Bank out of proportion
17 Jan 2019
‘Regulation should not be reworked purely to support automated advisers’
04 Jan 2019