Stamp duty debate a black hole
05 Feb 2021
At the moment I would describe the ongoing industry debate around an extension or tapering of the stamp duty holiday deadline as akin to a black hole, absorbing everything in its orbit.
The fact is that it’s understandable why so much effort is being put into lobbying the Government on this, but the longer we are left wondering whether any dispensation will be given, the edgier we (and our purchase clients) will get about whether they are going to complete by the 31st March and secure the saving.
These of course are unprecedented times and I have no doubt that the government would not have envisaged the country in its current pre-deadline lockdown putting even further pressure on all those stakeholders who are working on those transactions.
However, as the recent Parliamentary debate revealed, there is still no definitive answer on whether any kind of extension or taper will be offered, and that leaves all stakeholders with a mixture of both hope and fear.
I don’t expect any definitive answer either until next month’s Budget but, in my mind, there’s no doubting that an early decision – either way – would be beneficial to all. It would alleviate some of the stress and pressure, or it would signal that the line drawn in the sand is genuinely the end point, and perhaps allow those involved to make early decisions.
It remains likely that, unless there is a tapering/extension, a significant number of transactions won’t make that deadline. What that means in terms of aborted transactions remains to be seen – will those purchasers who may be just days/weeks away from completing pull out altogether if the stamp duty saving isn’t available to them, or will they carry on regardless and find the extra money?
Who can say at this time, although there are plenty of bodies/commentators suggesting that large numbers will abort. If that is going to be the case, then a tapering (rather than an extension) does seem fair.
It was made pretty clear in Parliamentary debate that this holiday was always meant to be time limited in scope, and a tapering could be deemed part of that definition.
I’m slightly amazed that some trade bodies and individuals are still calling for a six to 12-month extensions. That type of request is for the birds, and to an extent looks naive, greedy and suggests that the industry can’t handle its own workload, even if these are difficult times in terms of resource.
I therefore think a tapering sends out a good message, and to a large extent will keep large numbers of individuals ‘on board‘ when it comes to housing market engagement. Imagine if your first interaction with agents/advisers/lenders, etc, ended up in abject disappointment because your purchase couldn’t be completed before a deadline which would ultimately save you money. How might this impact your future engagement? Would you wish to interact again with those involved?
Far better to have a short period of grace now to allow those already well through the process to complete beyond the end of March and secure the saving, rather than putting off a vast number of individuals who might never trust the system again.

Blog Archive
Supply needs to match
02 Mar 2021
Don't overlook product transfers
19 Feb 2021
Stamp duty debate a black hole
05 Feb 2021
Industry wide levy is a head scratcher
02 Feb 2021
Long-term imposter product may finally become relevant as a high LTV option
29 Jan 2021
Uncertainty continues into 2021
07 Jan 2021
Stay ahead of the fraudsters
21 Dec 2020
Industry change starts with what we do ourselves and within our businesses
11 Dec 2020
Second lockdown will keep lender resource focused on payment deferrals
09 Nov 2020
Is now the right time to add to property portfolios?
08 Sep 2020
Advisers have duty of care as fraudsters step up scam activity
17 Aug 2020
IFAs and mortgage advisers – two sides of the same coin
12 Aug 2020
Brokers need fair play from lenders in high LTV space
31 Jul 2020
Are you ready for lock-stalgia?
03 Jul 2020
Show your clients what you can do
19 Jun 2020
Specialist lenders may need end to self-cert payment holidays to survive
16 Jun 2020
Reading the signals
15 Jun 2020
Is the FCA really in this with us?
28 May 2020
Self-employed people must not be locked out of future mortgage borrowing
11 May 2020
I wish I could say the worst is over
07 Apr 2020
Looking for scintillating letters of recommendation
11 Mar 2020
FCA must answer why it is promoting execution-only
25 Feb 2020
Goodbye doesn’t have to be forever
17 Feb 2020
FCA changes could have harmful consequences
07 Feb 2020
This could be the year of economic stimulation
03 Feb 2020
Putting the cart before the horse
17 Jan 2020
The start of a new decade
15 Jan 2020
The importance of advice
12 Dec 2019
Keep in touch with clients or lose them for good
06 Dec 2019
Later life market still needs work to be fit for purpose
22 Nov 2019
Helping mortgage prisoners
04 Nov 2019
Combatting mortgage fraud
20 Sep 2019
Upping demand for green mortgages
17 Jul 2019
Tory leadership hopefuls are right to be focused on social care in later life
01 Jul 2019
Responding to political messages about the housing market
20 Jun 2019
Promoting execution-only is not treating customers fairly
10 Jun 2019
Changing regulatory permissions can be the making of your business
14 May 2019
If we don’t talk up the market, then who will?
02 May 2019
Deeper product transfer data would show lenders’ market shifts
29 Mar 2019
Mortgage Market Study inconsistencies make for frustrating read
27 Mar 2019
The relationship between lender, broker and borrower
18 Feb 2019
Advisers must not leave mainstream mortgage market to lenders
28 Jan 2019
Let’s not blow Fleet and Secure Trust Bank out of proportion
17 Jan 2019
‘Regulation should not be reworked purely to support automated advisers’
04 Jan 2019